THE MODERN CHALLENGES TO UKRAINE’S CIVIL SOCIETY IN CONDITIONS OF POLITICAL INSTABILITY

  • Oleksandr Kornievskyy
  • Vitaliy Nechyporenko
Keywords: civil society, state, political system, social activity, civil activity, civil self-organization, democratization.

Abstract

The contradictory trends of civil society development in Ukraine, problematic aspects of its interaction with the institutions of state in terms of internal and external challenges are defined and characterized. Identified and characterized a set of extremely dangerous threats that pose challenges to the development of domestic civil society and can lead to degradation of the civil society or become a “growth point” of his organization, democratic influence on the political system and the state. Study determines that unreformed and corrupt political system is not promotes development for civil society in Ukraine.

References

1. Yermolenko, A. M., & Kiselov, O. O. (Eds.) (2005). Tsinnosti hromadianskoho suspilstva i moralnyі vybir: ukrainskyi dosvid [The values of civil society and the moral choice: Ukrainian experience]. Kyiv: Etna-1 [in Ukrainian].

2. Yablonskyi, V. M., Voznuk, P. F., Gorelov, D. M., Kornievskyі, O. A., & Rozumnyi M. M. (2015). Rozvytok hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini: analit. dop. [The development of civil society in Ukraine (analytical report)]. Kyiv: NISS [in Ukrainian].

3. Kudriatchenko, A. I., Bebik, V. M., & Bortnikov, V. I. (2007). Politychna systema i hromadianske suspilstvo: evropeyski i ukrainski realii [The political system and civil society: European and Ukrainian realities]. Kyiv: NISS [in Ukrainian].

4. Kresina, I. O., Skrypnuk, O. V., & Kovalenko, A. A. (2007). Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: problemy vzaiemodii [State and civil society in Ukraine: problems of interaction. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukrainian].

5. Toynbee, A. J. (2001). Postizhenie istorii. Genezis tsivilizatsiy. Vyizov-i-Otvet [The Geneses of Civilizations. Challenge-and-Response]. (Zharkova E. D., Transl.). Moscow: Rolf [іn Russian].

6. Latsyba, M. (2015). MinFin, pochui hromadskist! [Ministery of Finance, hear the public!]. Hromadianske suspilstvo – Civil Society, 4 (24). p. 2 [in Ukrainian].

7. Walicki, A. (1998). V poloni konservatyvnoi utopii: Struktura i vidozminy rosiyskoho slovianofilstva [In captivity of the conservative utopia: Structure and modification of Russian Slavophil’s]. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

8. Litkevich, V. (2016). Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo: protyvnyky chy partnery? [State and Civil Society: adversaries or partners?]. Dzerkalo tyzhna. Ukraina – Mirror of the Week. Ukraine, 15, 23–28 April [in Ukrainian].

9. Freedom House. freedomhouse.org. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nationstransit-2016 [in English].

10. Aslund, A. (2016). Bez podolannia korupcii lidery Ukrainy pryvedut yii do provalu [Without fighting corruption leaders of Ukraine will lead to failure]. radiosvoboda. org. Retrieved from http://www.radiosvoboda. org/a/28166354.html [in Ukrainian].

11. Reznik, O. (2011). Нromadianski praktyky v perehidnomu suspilstvi: chynnyky, subiekty, sposoby realizatsii [Civil Practices in the Transition Society: Factors, Subjects, Methods of Realization]. Kyiv: Institut of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Published
2018-08-04
How to Cite
Kornievskyy, O., & Nechyporenko, V. (2018). THE MODERN CHALLENGES TO UKRAINE’S CIVIL SOCIETY IN CONDITIONS OF POLITICAL INSTABILITY. Strategic Panorama, (1), 61-66. Retrieved from https://niss-panorama.com/index.php/journal/article/view/26
Section
Internal Policy