• Oleksandr Sukhodolia
Keywords: energy security of Ukraine, international assistance tools, models and principles of the energy markets, energy policy, management decisions.


This article analyzes the problems of energy security of Ukraine through the prism of energy markets transformation of from the “post-Soviet” to “market” model. The contradictions between declared energy policy priorities and practical steps of implementation and reasons to avoid taking the necessary decisions are analyzed. In the paper the impact of EU “best practice” as tools of possible transformation of Ukrainian energy policy is highlighted. The shortcomings of the tools, used by the international community in assisting Ukraine to reform, are considered.


1. Sukhodolia, О. (2014). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady zabezpechenia enerhetychnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Theoretical and methodological principles of energy security of Ukraine]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic Priorities, 2, 129–139 [in Ukrainian].

2. Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs, 85:2, 2006. Retrived from–03–01/ensuring-energy-security [in English].

3. Luft, G., Korin, A. (Ed.) (2009). Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century. A Reference Handbook. Praeger [in English].

4. Energetycheskaya Strategiya Rossii na period do 2030 [Energy Strategy of Russia up to 2030]. (n.d.). Retrived from aboutminen/energostrategy/ [in Russian].

5. Еnergy Independence and Security Act of 2007. (n.d.). Retrived from pkg/PLAW-110publ140/pdf/PLAW-110publ140.pdf [in English].

6. А 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Green Paper (released for public consultation). Brussels, 27.3.2013 COM (2013) 169 final. Retrived from http:// [in English].

7. Сhina’s Energy Policy 2012. Retrived from–10/24/ content_15845588.htm [in English].

8. Sukhodolia, О. (2016). Enerhetychne Spivtovarystvo ta Ukraina: tsili, priorytety ta problemy spivpratsi [Energy Community and Ukraine: Objectives, Priorities and Problems of cooperation]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic Priorities, 2, 13–26 [in Ukrainian].

9. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press [in English].

10. Sukhodolia, O. M., Smenkovskyi, A. Iu. (2013). Enerhetychnyi sektor Ukrainy: perspektyva reformuvannia chy stahnatsii [The energy sector of Ukraine: the prospect of reform or stagnation]. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic Priorities 2, 74–80 [in Ukrainian].

11. Sukhodolia, O. M. (2017). Rozdil 7.4. Enerhetychna pastka // Svitova hibrydna viina: Ukrainskyi front: monohrafiia [Chapter 7.4. Energy trap (in book: “World Hybrid war: Ukrainian front”: monograph)]. Кyiv: NISS [in Ukrainian].

12. Reva, A. My ne mozhemo pity na monetyzatsiiu subsydii [Andrii Reva: We can not go to the monetization of subsidies] (n.d.). Retrived from http:// [in Ukrainian].

13. EU assistance to Ukraine. Special report no 32/2016. (n.d.). Retrived from http://www.eca.europa. eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=40134 [in English].

14. Sait UNIAN. Yevropeiskyi sud audytu. Nadana za 8 rokiv findopomoha YeS na reformy v Ukraini mala «obmezhenyi vplyv» [Site of UNIAN. The European Court of Audit. Provided in 8 years finansial support reforms in Ukraine had a “limited impact”]. (n.d.). Retrived from nadana-za-8-rokiv-findopomoga-es-na-reformi-v-ukrajinimala-obmejeniy-vpliv-evropeyskiy-sud-auditu.html [in Ukrainian].

15. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., Webb, S. B., & Weingast, B. R. Limited Access Orders in the Developing World: A New Approach to the Problems of Development. WB. (n.d.). Retrived from http://econweb.umd. edu/~wallis/MyPapers/Limted_Access_Orders_in_the_ Developing_WorldWPS4359.pdf [in English].

16. Zvernennia Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy do parlamentiv ta orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady derzhav – chleniv Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu stosovno posylennia spivpratsi v haluzi enerhetychnoi bezpeky ta potentsiinykh ryzykiv realizatsii proektiv z budivnytstva tranzytnykh hazoprovodiv v obkhid Ukrainy [Address to the parliaments and governments of the countries – members of the European Union regarding strengthening of cooperation in the branch of energy security and potential risks of implementation of projects of the construction of transit gas pipelines bypassing Ukraine (Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine)]. (n.d.). ua. Retrived from ny/137422.html [in Ukrainian].

17. Germany’s Merkel Defends Russian Gas Pipeline Plan. (n.d.). Retrived from germanys-merkeldefends-russian-gas-pipelineplan-1450447499 [in English].

18. Sait UNIAN. Komisar YeS vidkydaie krytyku Kyieva na adresu Enerhetychnoho Spivtovarystva [Site of UNIAN. Commissioner of EU rejects criticism of Kyiv to the Energy Community]. (n.d.). Retrived from http:// ku-kieva-na-adresu-energetichnogo-spivtovaristva.html [in Ukrainian].
How to Cite
Sukhodolia, O. (2018). GEOPOLITICAL AND ECONOMIC PRIORITIES OF UKRAINE’S ENERGY SECURITY. Strategic Panorama, (1), 42-52. Retrieved from
Energy, Environmental and Technogenic Security