Keywords: Russian-Ukrainian war, narrative, power of discourse, war discourse, peace strategy


In times of war, the theoretical problems of the essence of war and peace acquire a practical dimension. The experience of the Russian-Ukrainian war, which became a key factor in changes in the international security system, requires understanding. The full-scale and unprovoked invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, as well as the further development of the conflict, dramatically changed the international community's perception of the stability of peace in Europe. The war prompted a revision of the assumptions about the nature of modern conflicts. Assumptions about a reduction in the weight of traditional means of warfare turned out to be premature. At the same time, non-kinetic military tools, in particular cognitive ones, retain their weight.

This article aims at defining the semantic logic of war and peace as relative concepts considered in a single conceptual space. The basic concept in this relationship is war, and peace is its conventional consequence. An analysis of the discursive implementation of both concepts allows us to project them onto political processes and determine the status of war and peace as reality. Particular attention is paid to the power of discourse.

In conclusion, the authors propose a Ukrainian Peace Strategy project, with 12 points representing the Ukrainian vision of the goals necessary to end the war.


Address of the President to the nation in connection with the situation in Donbass. (2022, Febuary 24). [in Russian].

Anglim, Simon. (2022, May 24). The Review and the Army Revisited: The Implications of the war in Ukraine. King’s College London. [in English].

Bilal, Arsalan. (2021, Novemder 30). Hybrid warfare – new threats, complexity and “trust” as an antidote. NATO Review. [in Ukrainian].

Claverie, Bernard,  Du Cluzel, François. (2022). “Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare. Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance. (Ed. by B. Claverie, B. Prébot, N. Buchler, F. du Cluzel). NATO Collaboration Support Office. [in English].

Freedman, Lawrence. (n.d.). Absolute Ends with Limited Means: Putin’s Self-Deception. Comment is Freed. [in English].

Galston, William A. (2022, May 03). How the Ukraine War Changed History. WSJ. Opinion.

Liddell – Scott. (n.d.). A Greek – English Lexicon, рр. 1432–1433 [in English].

Lucas, Edward. (2022, June 20). We need different experts to crack Russia. The Times. [in English].

NV. (2022, May 04). "It’s hard to even pronounce." The Kremlin abandoned the term "denazification", polls showed that residents of the aggressor country do not understand it – media. NV. [in Russian].

Oltermann, Philip. (2021, June 26). ‘At first I thought, this is crazy’: the real-life plan to use novels to predict the next war. The Guardian. [in English].

Oltermann, Philip. (2022, June 26). Don’t compare Ukraine invasion to first world war, says ‘Sleepwalkers’ historian. The Guardian. [in English].

Ottewell, Paul. (2020, December 07). Defining the Cognitive Domain. Over the Horizon. Multi-Domain Operations  Strategy. [in English].

Parakhonskyi, B.,  Yavorska, G. (2019). Ontology of War and Peace: Security, Strategy, Meaning. Kyiv, NISD. 560 p. [in Ukrainian].

Parakhonskyi, B.,  Yavorska, G. (2017). The Ontology of Hybrid War: A Game of Hidden Meanings. Strategìčna Panorama, 1, 7‒16 [in Ukrainian].

Siteanu, Eugen. (2007). Knowledge-Based Warfare (Cognitive Warfare). Strategic Impact, 3 [in English].

Snyder, Timothy. (2022, April 08). Russia’s genocide handbook. The evidence of atrocity and of intent mounts. Thinking about… [in English].

The State Duma of the Russian Federation proposes to put Poland "in line for denazification". (2022, May 13). Ukrinform. URL: [in Ukrainian].

Underwood, Kimberly. (n.d.). Cognitive Warfare Will Be Deciding Factor in Battle: Lt. Gen. Stewart’s Remarks at DoDIIS17. Signal, The Cyber Edge. [in English].

How to Cite
Parakhonskyi, B., & Yavorska, H. (2022). THE WAR AS A RESULT OF THE FRAGILE PEACE: THE CONCEPTUAL LOGIC OF WAR. Strategic Panorama, 12-24.