PERSONIFICATION AS A STRATEGY OF HISTORICAL POLICY IN UKRAINE

Keywords: historical policy, personification, pantheon, heroes, commemoration

Abstract

This article analyzes personification as a historical policy strategy, which consists in the memorialization of certain historical and cultural figures. The relevance of this analysis is determined by the dominance of this strategy in modern historical policy as well as its popularity among various policy actors in Ukraine at different levels of executive power. At the same time, the choice of this strategy is usually not substantiated in official documents, which entails that conclusions can be drawn mostly based on policy results, retrospectively. The author outlines the genesis of personification traditions in Ukraine, formed within the frameworks of citizen, activist and patriarchal types of political culture. Ukraine’s inclusion into imperial entities such as the Russian Empire and the USSR led to a significant impact of imperial memory policy on the traditions and formats of commemoration in Ukraine. The study focuses on the phenomenon of “vozhdism” (leaderism) and the formation of the Soviet official pantheon. The author attempts to define the concept of pantheon as an imaginary set of iconic figures of history and culture, recognized as worthy of homage in the civic rituals of common commemoration. There is a correlation between the functions of the national pantheon and the choices of figures made as well as the appropriate vocabulary required. This correlation is illustrated through perceptions of heroes, which often become an instrument of ideological mobilization. Modern historiography offers an alternative understanding of heroes, with an emphasis on cultural, ethical and academic leadership. This understanding is increasingly influencing the formation of historical policy, particularly in Ukraine. It is also promising to interpret heroes as integrators, especially given the challenge of consolidation facing historical policy in Ukraine. The findings suggest that personification is neither a universal nor a self-evident tool for achieving this goal. There are other promising strategies focusing on events (“eventfulness”) and processes (“procedurality”).

References

Volianuk, O. (2015). Personalized past in the modern political life of Ukraine and Russia. Naukovi zapysky Institutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen imeni I. F. Kurasa, 1, 265–276 [in Ukrainian].

Kasianov, G. (2018). Past Continuous: Historical politics of the 1980s – 2000s: Ukraine and its neighbors. Kyiv: Laurus, Antropos-Logos-Film, 420 p. [in Ukrainian].

Grinin, L. E. (2010). Personality in History: Evolution of Views. Istoria i sovremennost, 2, 3–44 [in Russian].

Riabenko, S. (2020, December 28). Paper “leader” from the session hall: how the Verkhovna Rada was decommunized. Istorychna Pravda. https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2020/12/28/158741/ [in Ukrainian].

Sulkovskyi, F. V. (1928). Leaders in history. Moskow-Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoie izdatelstvo, 120 p. [in Russian].

Bakhanov, K. (2013). New times – new heroes: formation of the culture of memory in Ukraine. In Yu. Shapoval (Ed.). Culture of historical memory: European and Ukrainian experience. Kyiv: IPIEND, pp. 182–216 [in Ukrainian].

Lipman, M. (2020, June 26). The pantheon of national heroes as an element of symbolic politics. Colta. https://www.colta.ru/articles/specials/24756-mariya-lipman-panteon-natsionalnyh-geroev-simvolicheskaya-politika [in Russian].

Kyrydon, A. M. (Ed). (2013). National and historical memory: a glossary of key terms. Kyiv: DP NVZ «Pryoritety», 436 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kyrydon, A. (2010). Historians Interpretations of Past: Five Explorations of Memory. Rivne: RIS KSU, 128 p. [in Ukrainian].

Malevych and Lobanovskyi – The Institute of National Remembrance will glorify new heroes who unite people. (2019, December 11). Ukrainski novyny. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://ukranews.com/ua/news/671724-instytut-natspam-yati-sfokusuyetsya-na-komunikatsiyi-z-inshymy-derzhavamy [in Ukrainian].

Lysenko, O. (2021). Heroes – antiheroes, “own – enemies”: glorification, deglorification and demonization as tools of ideological construction and social mobilization during the Second World War. In Kultura dialohy. Natsionalnyi kruhlyi stil: zbirnyk statei. Kharkiv: Pholio, pp. 61–80 [in Ukrainian].

Vzhosek, V. (2011). History – Culture – Metaphor. The emergence of non-classical historiography. About historical thinking. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 296 p. [in Ukrainian].

Topolskyi, Y. (2012). How we write and understand history. Secrets of historical narrative. Kyiv: «K.I.S.», 400 p. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. On the celebration of memorable dates and anniversaries in 2022–2023: Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of 17.12.2021 No. 1982-IX. (2021). Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1982-IX#Text [in Ukrainian].

Hanzhurov, Yu. S. (2011). On the issue of updating the concepts of national memory. Natsionalna ta istorychna pamiat, 1, 53–70 [in Ukrainian].

Published
2022-07-06
How to Cite
Mykhailova, O. (2022). PERSONIFICATION AS A STRATEGY OF HISTORICAL POLICY IN UKRAINE. Strategic Panorama, (1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.1.2022.02
Section
Articles