Keywords: power transition theory, hegemony, conflict, stability.


The article examines manifestations of China’s rise and the attendant risks for the international security system.

The author draws on a set of key approaches to measuring state power in his analysis of China’s hard and soft power as well as its structural capabilities. It has been demonstrated that China is closing the gap on the USA on key power indicators – the economic capabilities and military resources. However, a number of factors are slowing down its progress. With regard to the structural power, soft power and potential to engage allies the USA continues to hold significant advantages.

China’s hegemonic aspirations bring about considerable structural transformations into international politics and impact international security. Redistribution of power and influence would reconfigure alliances, and impose new limitations on the actions and expectations of states. The rise of China and growing tensions between China and the USA would cause a complex and large-scale impact on the security of not only those two states, but the rest of the world as well. At both global and bilateral levels, security institutions and structures will undergo changes.

The rise of bipolarity will escalate the standoff. The USA and China may become hostages to Thucydides Trap, whereby steps to maximize one’s security will lead to a greater threat – and eventually to a devastating conflict – as the other party will also try to reciprocate. China's rise may also pose a security dilemma for potential allies of both countries, weaken international institutions of cooperation and security, and engender a deep crisis of confidence.

Scenarios of how the system of international security could respond are examined from the perspective of a security dilemma, power transition theory, and hegemonic stability theory. While both theories view the situation as challenging, they differ in their analysis of the sources and scale of risks.


Acharya, A. (2014). The End of American World Order. New York: Polity [in English].

Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt [in English].

Layne, C. (2018). The U.S. – Chinese Power Shift and the End of Pax Americana. International Affairs, 94(1), 89–111 [in English].

Luttwak, E. (2012). The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy. Cambridge: Belknap Press [in English].

Mahbubani, K. (2020). Has China Won: the Chinese Challenge to American Primacy. New York: Public Affairs [in English].

Mahbubani, K. (2009). The New Asian Hemisphere: the Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. New York: Public Affairs [in English].

Subraminian, A. (2011). Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China’s Economic Dominance. Washington, D.C.: Petersen Institute for International Economics [in English].

The World Bank. GDP, PPP. (n.d.). The World Bank. Retrieved August 1, 2021 from indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD [in English].

Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. World Military Spending Rises to Almost $2 trillion in 2020. SIPRI. (2021, April 26). Retrieved August 8, 2021 from rises-almost-2-trillion-2020 [in English].

Full text of President Xi’s Speech at opening of Belt and Road forum. (2017, May 14). Retrieved August 8, 2021 from [in English].

Brand Finance. Global Soft Power Index 2020. (n.d.). Brand Finance. Retrieved August 8, 2021 from https:// [in English].

The Soft Power 30. (n.d.). Retrieved August 8, 2021 from [in English].

Kapitonenko, M. (2019). Theory of International Relations. Chernivtsi: Knyhy – XXI, 272 p. [in Ukrainian].

How to Cite
Kapitonenko, M. (2021). THE RISE OF CHINA: IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. Strategic Panorama, (1-2), 113-119.